Define a brand voice people can apply
Translate abstract style words into observable writing choices and forbidden patterns.
'Professional and human' is too vague to apply consistently. Describe word choice, sentence length, form of address, information density, attitude towards claims, and typical structure. Add short good and bad examples and explain which feature counts.
Distinguish between brand voice and situational tone. The brand voice remains recognizable; a complaint requires more empathy than a promotion. Check output not only for style, but also for factual accuracy and suitability for the channel.
- Concrete language rules
- Good and bad examples
- Voice versus tone
- Prohibited claims
- Channel context
Terms in plain language
- Brand voice
- Recurring features of the way an organisation writes.
- Tone
- How a text sounds in a particular situation, for example calm or enthusiastic.
A brand remains expert and direct, but responds to a complaint more calmly and with a clear corrective action.
Create a style guide from [sample texts] with ten observable rules, five patterns to avoid, and three short examples. Separate fixed brand voice from tone per situation. Do not invent brand claims.Build a compact style guide and test it on an email, web text, and complaint response.
You receive a polished report with source codes. Which three checks from chapter 5 do you perform before reusing it?
- Use the coverage list to check which parts were read and which were not.
- Open the supporting source passages and recalculate important figures with the appropriate formula and units.
- Preserve uncertainties and separate source facts from interpretation; source codes alone are insufficient.